Re: EADA "The Ruling Body"
Sunday, 18 January 2009 22:07
Dear propro
How dare you. I have been consistent in everything I have said. My argument is with an inefficient organisation not individual professionals or even the profession in general. But the fact remains it is my professional colleagues who I believe are hampering progress. The amateurs in contrast are making progess suggesting change but are deliberaly stonewalled at every turn. Your personal attack on me, my integrity and my own professionalism is testament to this but I will ignore it as to rise to it.......
You say: "To quote you: Stop attacking those attempting to do a difficult job.
I do not like to mention names and make things personal BUT
Robert Bellinger is the relatively new Vice President of the BDC. Linda Bellinger -Ivanets is the BDC Representative for the the British Competitors and I can tell you the Bellinger family are honourable trustworthy Professionals who have done and will continue to do more for dancing in any one year than you will in your lifetime. You disagree and believe you are better and wish to repeat your fellow Professionals cannot be trusted then do so now.
I name only one family out of many. Get a grip on reality and put your jealousy behind you. You owe a huge apology to Professionals throughout the U.K."
What has the fact that Robert Bellinger being the newly appointed chairman of the BDC got to do with anything. I have not mentioned him or his family. So I would ask that you desist from deliberately trying to make me out as some subversive. He no doubt does a wonderful job given the fact that the body he is chairman of gives the appearance of douing a lot when the reality is quite the opposite..
The fact is the BDC as a collective organisation has been around for about 70 years. As the supposed (and self appointed) governing body of the dance sport world in this country it has presided over the demise of dancing in this country which has now lasted for at least 25 years. And it has done precious little about it. Yes, you could argue that changes in the country - economic, social etc will have affected theb dance world but that is an excuse and anot a reason for oing nothing about it. Unlike other sports it has never to my knowledge produced one document or blueprint in showing what can be done to improve things nationally or locally. That to my mind is an abrogation of its responsibility as a governing body.
From what I hear it even refused to have anything to do with the successful BBC TV programme when originally approached. If this is an example of setting standards in good governance then my view of the whole Dance Sport world is well founded.
You can falsely accuse me of some supposed jealousy but what or whom I have to be jealous of or about is beyond me. I no longer have any interest in trying to change an inefficient organisation which has no idea how to change. I have better things to do and too old. But I have every right to make my views known. You might not like what I say. That is your right. But it is also my right to say what I think. While I have attacked views that is perfectly acceptable in a democracy, I have not attacked anyonepersonally. This forum is made up it seems with people who are more interested in attacking others than coming up with viable ideas. Those who try to suggest ideas are then accused of being juvenile. People like minime, ricardo and marvin might just have ideas butwill you and others listen to them. Somehow I doubt it.
As for Robert Bellinger, he is relatively young so lets hope he instills a little more democracy and umph into this ailing body. However, no doubt if he does have the gumption to try and change the organisation from within he'll be personally attacked for doing so. Organisations like people, don't like change, that's well understood. But change has to happen if anything is to develop.
This simple fact which you won't accept is stifling the sport's development in this country. And is shown up very well with the lack of competitors at home (particularly juveniles), and the lack of success internationally. No doubt the latter is all the fault of the IDSF and its corrupt judges.
As I have feet in two camps nowadays I see things from 2 angles. Last year, EADA was put under enormous pressure by - guess who - professionals. EADA handled this well despite some professionals even having the audacity to try and have EADA disbanded. Why? I have my own ideas about that.
The BDC is beginning to outgow its usefulness. It is the equivalent of the Neanderthal. And we know what happened to them. They weren't prepared to adapt or had the facilities to do so. Look at Woolworths - a great institution - no more for the very same reasons.
For your information propro I want the BDC to succeed. I want it to be the legal governing body. But I want it to be one which is accountable and has some teeth. And is prepared to do what is necessary as the National Skating Association did some 5 years ago and is now reaping benefits; similarly the Lawn Tennis Association.Dance Sport deserves just as much.
You can personally attack me as much as you like; you can name drop as much as you like but there is an old saying: Once you do resort to this you've lost the argument.
You said :"You tell me ..............you know of absolutely nothing good that the British Dance Council has done?"
Except for introducing Juvenile dress and the Everybody's born to dance scheme, there is little else the BDC has really done from what I can see. It makes rules and does nothing else. People even have to pay an exorbitant amount of money just to read the rules. They should be on the BDC web site. If people wish to buy a hard copy so be it but to expect teachers, dancers, parents etc to buy this important booklet as a first resort is disgraceful. And I'm not alone in holding this view.
As for the dance scheme, while a good idea in principle it is badly organised with no proper monitoring system that the whole of the Dance Sport world can find out and not just a few people at the BDC or some other office. Simply offering it is ridiculous and expecting it to succeed in flooding dance schools and competitions with new excited youngsters is ridiculous. In any event, I along with probably many other teachers have been teaching in primary school with great success far longer than the scheme's been around. I have no need for this scheme but again that isn't the point.
The BDC is comprised as you will no doubt know of an an inbuilt majority of professionals, most of those representing organisations that have their own members interests - namely teachers such as myself at heart. They do not have the interests of dancing in general at heart, in particular competitive dancing.Understandable but in my humble opinion very shortsighted.
Even the BDF have become somewhat exasperated with the slow cumbersome aproach of the BDC. There are no new ideas coming out yet they have numerous committees
If you with you great respect for the socalled greats of this wonderful sport of ours have ideas to improve things inthis country then by all means share them with us. Do what Peter has asked. But i doubt you will be able to refrain from attacking me for daring to disagree with you and stand my ground.
|